Last Saturday’s Irish Times opinion page, like most Saturdays, had a piece by Noel Whelan. In this the former FF candidate and FF electoral advisor with a weekly column in a national newspaper laid out the reasons why citizens ought not be permitted to state their opinions publically. It was, he argued unpersuasively, a danger to democracy.
I’ve been struggling to hold thoughts in my head long enough to put a comprehensive response together. Mostly, I’ve now been spared the effort.
I’ll only add the observation that the unregulated sphere of VoteTube and the internet generally has seen, in only a few months, a more real sense of the public, of politics and of politicians than the last three elections of regulated speech put together.
4 Comments
hmmm.. the logic to Mr Whelan’s piece was as clear as Galway tap water. Citizens speaking their mind a threat to democracy. Somewhat Putin-esque.
The piece on Mcgarrsolicitors on the other hand was as crisp as a chilled bottle of Evian.
But Cheaper.
[…] even further our definition of democracy. And with good reason. As Noel Whelan (FF majordomo) pointed out on Saturday, letting non-politicians involve themselves in the great public conversation would undermine the […]
[…] wonder what Noel Whelan of Irish Times fame makes of this attempt by citizens to exercise not just their right of free […]